Thalitone

This study tests whether adding CHW support to usual nutrition care helps adults with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or chronic kidney disease manage their diet and health. At Caridad Center, a free clinic in Palm Beach County, Florida, usual care includes medical nutrition therapy from a registered dietitian and medically tailored groceries. Many patients find it hard to keep up dietary changes because of limited nutrition knowledge, cooking skills, food costs, and cultural fit. Two hundred adults will be randomly assigned to usual care or usual care plus INTEGRATE-CHW, a 12-week program of six sessions with a trained CHW. In each session the participant selects one or two goals from the dietitian's plan and builds an action plan with the CHW. The dietitian remains responsible for the nutrition plan. The study will compare nutrition self-efficacy, nutrition literacy, diet quality, food security, and clinical measures between groups at baseline and Week 12. It will also evaluate how well the program fits into routine clinic care.

SWAP-CKM (SWitching to Appropriate Prescription in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome) is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate whether electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts can improve medication prescribing among adults with cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic (CKM) conditions. The study will include all eligible adult patients receiving care within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) who have CKM conditions and opportunities for therapeutic medication substitution. Fifteen service areas are randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a usual care group. Clinicians in the intervention group will receive EHR-based Best Practice Advisories (BPAs) identifying opportunities to replace potentially inappropriate medications with guideline-recommended therapies. The intervention may also include audit-and-feedback reports to support medication optimization. Clinicians retain full discretion over treatment decisions. The primary outcome is the proportion of eligible therapeutic optimization opportunities achieved at 9 months. Secondary outcomes include medication initiation and discontinuation, medication optimization at 18 months, and polypharmacy burden.

The GOAL-BP pilot study will help determine whether a study comparing two blood pressure goals can be carried out in adults with end-stage kidney disease and high blood pressure who receive peritoneal dialysis. The main questions it aims to answer are whether eligible patients can be recruited for the study. Researchers will compare two goals for the top blood pressure number (systolic blood pressure): below 120 mmHg versus below 140 mmHg.This pilot study will help plan a larger trial in the future. Participants will: * Be assigned by chance to one of the two blood pressure goals. * Have their blood pressure measured at clinic visits about every two weeks. * Work with their kidney doctor on recommended changes to fluid management, peritoneal dialysis treatment, or blood pressure medicines to reach their assigned goal. * Be part of the study for about four and a half months.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) when implemented as part of routine inpatient physical therapy care in patients undergoing evaluation for advanced heart therapies. The secondary aim is to determine if IMT improves 6-minute walk test (6MWT), dyspnea, Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) pre-operatively. Thirdly, to determine if IMT decreases ICU and hospital length of stay post-operatively.

Gastric variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection is the current standard treatment; however, recurrent bleeding and procedure-related complications remain important concerns. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided coil and cyanoacrylate glue injection has emerged as a promising alternative that may improve variceal obliteration and reduce rebleeding rates. This prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial will compare EUS-guided coil and cyanoacrylate glue injection with conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection in patients with cirrhosis presenting with bleeding gastric varices. A total of 158 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either treatment arm. The primary outcome is all-cause rebleeding at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include technical success, early and late rebleeding, number of treatment sessions required for variceal obliteration, glue volume used, procedure-related adverse events, hepatic decompensation, duration of hospital stay, cost of treatment, and mortality.

This study plans to learn more about contributors to high blood pressure in men who undergo androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to treat prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in men, affecting approximately 1 in 8 American men and its primary treatment is through the use of ADT. However, ADT increases the likelihood of developing heart disease including high blood pressure. This study will determine if dysfunction of the nervous system and/or kidneys occurs in men undergoing ADT, as these systems play a significant role in control of blood pressure. The results from this study will help us understand the ways in which ADT contributes to heart disease and help us develop therapies to prevent heart disease in prostate cancer survivors.

High blood pressure, also called hypertension, raises the risk of heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease. Medications work well for many people, but some people still have blood pressure that stays too high, or they have side effects from their medications. Researchers are looking for treatments that do not involve taking more medication. Nerves help control blood pressure by changing how blood vessels tighten and how hard the heart pumps. Because of this, treatments that act on nerves may be able to lower blood pressure. Spinal cord stimulation is a treatment already used to manage long-term pain. It uses a small device, placed under the skin during a standard operation, that sends mild electrical signals to the spine. Laboratory studies suggest that stimulating the lower part of the mid-back may also lower blood pressure, but this has not been carefully studied in people who already use these devices. This study will look at whether changing the settings on a spinal cord stimulator affects blood pressure. About 11 adults who have high blood pressure and who already have a spinal cord stimulator for long-term pain. No new device will be placed, and no surgery or other invasive procedure will be done for this study. Participants attend a series of study visits. At each visit, trained staff record blood pressure and heart rate while the stimulator is turned on, turned off, and set to other settings that the person's care team has approved and that the person finds comfortable. There are rest breaks between each setting. Over successive visits, the study team works to identify the settings that best lower blood pressure. Participants can stop at any time, and their usual settings are restored at the end of each visit. The study will also look at whether this kind of testing is practical and comfortable for participants. The results will help researchers decide whether larger studies of spinal cord stimulation for blood pressure control are worth doing.

This study is being done to better understand how the study team can treat pain for people with cirrhosis and depression. Enrolled participants on this feasibility study will be randomized to Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation (TEA) or sham TEA.

This study will test the mechanisms of a multi-component, nurse-led, primary palliative care intervention, HEart failure Resilience Intervention for Caregivers (HEROIC) to improve caregiver mental well-being, patient health-related quality of life and unplanned acute care in the setting of advanced heart failure. The investigators will conduct a multi-site, randomized controlled trial to test proposed mechanisms of action in a large sample (N=500) of persons with heart failure and the caregivers. The investigators will also examine variation in response to HEROIC components by heart failure subgroup (ventricular assist device, heart transplant or medically managed heart failure).

Living with heart failure for adults over age 50 is hard. Older adults have to take many medicines to address heart failure and other health problems. That group of individuals must decide which medications to take and which devices to use to support heart health. Doctors, nurses, and social workers help patients understand these options but do not always know what is most important to them. Talking with patients about what the patients are hoping for, what the patients are worried about, and how much the patients understand about the illness is called a serious illness conversation, and it is hard to do. Doctors, nurses, and social workers are very busy and worry about upsetting patients by bringing up hard topics. The Serious Illness Care Program helps doctors, nurses, and social workers have these conversations by giving the staff a script to follow on what to say. The program also includes ways to make sure staff remember to have the conversation, a brief training, and how to document what is said during the conversation. But, nobody has studied the Serious Illness Care Program in a heart failure clinic, so it has not been customized to meet the needs of heart failure teams or older adults with heart failure. Many programs that are supposed to help patients fail in the real world. One reason is that patients do not include the needs of those who will receive and deliver it. Before this project, the team interviewed heart failure doctors, nurses, social workers, and other staff at a heart failure clinic. As well as interviewing older adults and care partners. The team asked staff how the Serious Illness Care Program can be changed to fit the needs and work in the clinic. The program includes a conversation guide that helps the team know what to say, so the study team asked patients and care partners what the thoughts on the language used and the topics covered. Then, the team practiced putting the program in place at the clinic and trained clinicians on using the Serious Illness Care Program with older adults and family members. Now the team wants to see if the heart failure team likes it and if it is doable. The team will also ask patients and care partners about the conversation and about feelings of anxiety before, during, and after the conversation. Lastly, the team will ask the individuals before and after the conversation about patients' knowledge of heart failure and how prepared the care partner feels to care for the individual. The team also want to explore how the program helps clinicians understand patients' symptoms, quality of life, and illness knowledge. Ultimately, this project establishes a structured framework to facilitate goals-of-care discussions between heart failure teams, patients, and families. These conversations empower patients to make immediate and future medical decisions aligned with personal values and lifestyle preferences. This values-based decision-making process optimizes care delivery and supports patients in achieving optimal health outcomes.

Approximately 15% of the U.S. population has chronic kidney disease, and \~700,000 patients are in full kidney failure also called end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The optimal treatment for ESKD is living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), followed by deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT); however, the standard of care continues to be ongoing dialysis, which has poor clinical outcomes in comparison to LDKT and DDKT. Best practices to transform kidney care recommended by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) and the 2019 Executive Order Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative include earlier detection of patients whose kidneys are deteriorating rapidly, introducing transplant as a potential treatment option earlier, optimally before their kidneys fail, improved dissemination of health literate transplant education tools, often through digital technology or mHealth, and increasing LDKT rates by helping patients locate living donors or motivating others to donate. Barriers at the patient-, support network-, clinician- and system-levels of the Socio-Ecological Model persist, including poor identification of high-risk patients, insufficient clinician time to discuss transplant, poor transplant knowledge, reluctance or insufficient support to ask living donors to donate, and disengaged friends and relatives, some of whom who might become living donors. While extensive policy and intervention efforts are underway, none have achieved significant increases in pursuit and receipt of transplant, especially LDKT rates. In 2017, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated care system serving 24,000 CKD patients, partnered with the Transplant Research and Education Center (TREC) at Houston Methodist Research Institute (HMRI) and J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center Houston Methodist Hospital (HMH) to launch a multi-year plan for transforming CKD and ESKD care. Investigators now propose to conduct a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of a novel multilevel intervention to improve CKD and ESKD care, improve transplant rates and reduce disparities. One innovative component of the multilevel intervention is a state-of-the-art technology-supported mHealth application, developed in partnership with patients, to engage patients, family members, and potential living donors to improve their CKD knowledge, view transplant success stories, and seek kidney-related support to pursue transplant, including learning how to find living donors. Investigators also seek to identify moderators at various socio-ecological levels, especially factors influencing variations in effectiveness across different settings and among underserved patient subgroups known to have reduced access to transplant and build implementation tools to increase access to and pursuit of transplant within large integrated health systems including comparable systems (commercial, academic, safety net) across the U.S.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test a low-touch vs high-touch drug-free pain self-management program that may help lower pain and improve quality of life for adults with cirrhosis and pain. Participants are assigned by chance to one of two study groups. The groups receive different levels of support. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do the programs help lower pain? * Do the programs improve quality of life? * Is one program more effective than the other? Researchers will compare a low-touch self management program to a high-touch self-management program to see if the programs help manage pain. Participants in the low-touch arm will: * Learn new ways to manage pain without medication * Receive access to the self-guided digital self-management platform * Receive general behavioral text message nudges * Receive a free Fitbit to keep Participants in the high-touch arm will: * Learn new ways to manage pain without medication * Receive tailored access to the self-guided digital self-management platform * Received individualized pain coaching and optional group coaching sessions * Participate in a structured walking or meditation curriculum * Receive a free Fitbit to keep