Lexapro

Ketamine is often used to treat depression where standard treatments have failed. Yet, even with ketamine, depression can persist and make it difficult to keep up with life. This study examines whether it is practical, safe and helpful to use a talk therapy (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, ACT) in patients with difficult-to-treat depression receiving ketamine through the Ketamine Intervention Program at UBC Hospital. Researchers expect that combining ACT plus Ketamine ("K-ACT") will be feasible, safe, and will help patients functioning better in their daily lives, feeling that they are recovering, and having fewer symptoms of depression.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ALKS 7290 following oral administration in adult participants with Major Depressive Disorder.

The purpose of this study is to understand how the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a region at the front of the brain, guides decisions about whether to pursue a possible reward when doing so also carries a risk of loss, and how this process is altered in depression. People with depression are often less motivated by rewards and more sensitive to potential losses, leading them to avoid situations that others would approach. The OFC is thought to play a central role in these "approach or avoid" decisions, but how it normally does so, and what goes wrong in depression, is not well understood. This study asks two questions: (1) How does activity in different parts of the OFC signal the decision to approach or avoid? (2) Does this activity differ in people with depression in a way that explains a bias toward avoidance? We hypothesize that the medial OFC (toward the middle of the brain) signals approach, the lateral OFC (toward the side of the brain) signals avoidance, and that in depression the medial OFC signal is weakened, tipping decisions toward avoidance. Participants are adults who are hospitalized with stereo-EEG (sEEG) electrodes already placed in the brain by their medical team, either to locate the source of seizures in epilepsy or as part of a separate clinical trial for treatment-resistant depression. The electrodes are placed for clinical reasons only, not for this study. During their hospital stay, participants complete a short, game-like computer task (about 20 minutes per session) in which they repeatedly choose whether to approach or avoid options that offer different chances of reward and loss. Their choices and reaction times are recorded along with brain activity from the existing electrodes, and participants rate their mood before each session. The researchers will compare OFC activity during approach versus avoid decisions, use mathematical models of decision-making to measure how strongly each participant weighs rewards and losses, and compare participants with and without depression. No drugs, devices, or brain stimulation are given as part of this study. The findings are intended to guide the development of more targeted brain-stimulation treatments for treatment-resistant depression.

More efficacious treatments for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in Veterans are urgently needed. Psilocybin is a promising novel treatment that is likely to be the first FDA-approved psychedelic, but its safety and efficacy remain unclear. To address this gap, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of a single dose of psilocybin paired with a brief course of a VA-endorsed evidence-based psychotherapy (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) in Veterans with MDD. Our trial addresses key limitations of previous studies including the challenge of management of expectancy effects, a focus on Veterans with input from Veterans, and a study population that reflects the demographics and medical and psychiatric complexity of the VHA patient population. Our study also explores psilocybin's antidepressant mechanisms focusing on changes in psychological flexibility and synaptic plasticity. In sum, this study will provide critical and timely data to determine if psilocybin treatment is a safe and efficacious treatment for MDD in Veterans.

Subclinical depression - depressive symptoms that fall below the threshold for major depressive disorder - is common in young adults and predicts later depressive episodes, yet it often goes untreated. This study tests whether a brief, remotely delivered non-deceptive (open-label) placebo intervention reduces subclinical depressive symptoms over approximately two weeks. Participants aged 18-30 living in Ohio, with PHQ-8 scores in the 5-9 range, are randomly assigned to one of three groups: a non-deceptive placebo group, a blinded control group, or an unblinded control group. All participants complete three remote sessions over 16-18 days and complete the same assessments on the same schedule. Participants in the non-deceptive placebo group additionally receive psychoeducation about placebo effects and placebo pills that are explicitly described as containing no active ingredients, which they take twice daily for two weeks. Participants in the unblinded control group are told they have been assigned to a control condition. Participants in the blinded control group are not told their group assignment until debriefing at the end of the study. The study has two aims. The first is to estimate the effect of the non-deceptive placebo intervention on depressive symptoms and related outcomes. The second is methodological: to determine whether telling control participants that they are in a control group changes their outcomes, and therefore whether the choice of control condition systematically biases estimates of non-deceptive placebo effects.

The goal of this study is to learn if a meditation intervention called Transcendental Meditation or TM can be used in a small department at Weill Cornell Medicine to help reduce employees' levels of burnout, anxiety, insomnia, and depression as well as to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the meditation practice by Weill Cornell employees. The main question the study aims to answer is whether: • Levels of burnout, anxiety, insomnia, and depression will be decreased, and overall mental well-being will improve over a 3.5-month period before and after TM intervention. Participants will attend 9 sessions total (8 group sessions and 1 individual session) with a certified TM instructor from The David Lynch Foundation Institute for Mental Health and Resilience where they will gain experience in proper TM techniques. Also, participants will conduct 2 of their own TM sessions at home daily during the course of this study.

The researchers are testing a single-group cognitive-behavioral intervention for treating traumatic stress related to interpersonal and developmental trauma in LGBTQ adults. This study requires in-person participation weekly at the UAB campus in Birmingham, AL.

The purpose of this research is to see if an experimental treatment for depression called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a form of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be improved for better results using electroencephalography (EEG) recordings (brain waves) for individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). This is a feasibility study to test a "closed-loop" procedure which guides the timing of this FDA-cleared form of TMS. Each participant will receive an active experimental treatment, and the timing of the TMS pulses will be at one of three phases in the brain wave of interest.

This study will compare transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with sham TMS in people with opioid use disorder who are taking buprenorphine and have major depressive disorder with ongoing depressive symptoms. The study will evaluate whether TMS improves depressive symptoms and reduces opioid craving. The study will also assess smoking behaviors, treatment acceptability, and any side effects related to TMS.

This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and neurophysiological mechanisms of home-based spaced tDCS in TRD through a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial conducted under remote supervision. Specifically, this trial will: (1) compare the efficacy of active versus sham spaced tDCS on depressive symptom severity in individuals with TRD and (2) characterize neurophysiological changes associated with spaced tDCS using TMS-EEG, TMS-EMG and resting state EEG.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if treatment with the BTL-699-2 device (non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) can decrease anxiety symptoms in adults (aged 22 years and older) diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the accelerated treatment protocol using the BTL-699-2 device reduce self-reported anxiety symptoms (as measured by the GAD-7 scale) 3 months after the final treatment? What are the safety and side effects associated with the use of the BTL-699-2 device during this accelerated protocol? Researchers will compare the active treatment group (Group A, receiving stimulation intensity of up to 70% of the individual's motor threshold) to a sham control group (Group B, receiving an inactive stimulation intensity of 5% of their motor threshold) to see if the active brain stimulation works to treat Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Participants will: * Attend a screening/baseline visit to confirm GAD diagnosis (using the MINI diagnostic interview), review medical history, and establish their individual motor threshold. * Complete 8 study treatment visits scheduled twice weekly (2 to 4 days apart) over approximately 4 weeks. Each visit will consist of two consecutive 19-minute treatment sessions delivered at least 15 minutes apart (for a total of 16 treatments). * Complete self-reported and clinician-reported questionnaires assessing anxiety (GAD-7, HAM-A), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), well-being (WEMWBS), suicidal risk (CSSRS), clinical improvement (CGI-I, PGI-I), and treatment comfort/satisfaction (TCQ, SSQ) at designated baseline, treatment, and follow-up visits. * Undergo a urine pregnancy test at baseline and once weekly (every other treatment visit) if they are women of childbearing potential. * Attend 2 follow-up visits scheduled at 1 month and 3 months after the final treatment to evaluate long-term outcomes and safety

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether a personalized approach to treatment selection improves symptoms in older adults with treatment-resistant depression. The main questions it aims to answer is: Will using the BAARD predictive models to select medications lead to better depression outcomes, compared to randomly selecting medications? Researchers will use the BAARD predictive models or random assignment to choose one of two medications to add to patients' current treatment. Patients will be asked to take either aripiprazole or bupropion along with their current medication. Participants will: Take Aripiprazole or Bupropion in addition to their current medication for 10 weeks. Complete follow-up assessments every 1-2 weeks for checkups.