Corvert

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two clinical treatment Arms, both of which are standard care procedures performed in the right atrium (RA): Arm A: Pacing from the Bachmann's Bundle (BB) in the right atrium (upper right chamber of the heart) Arm B: Pacing from the right atrial appendage (RAA - a sac attached to the right atrium) Neither of these treatments are experimental; both are routinely performed by Electrophysiologists in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study is to compare side by side these two treatments and evaluate if one is better than the other. After the procedure, participants will be followed for one year. Medical record data will be collected, and a blood sample will be collected upon enrollment and at one year after implantation. Research-related surveys will be completed at the standard-care 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits.

This randomized study was designed to compare two antithrombotic regimens (long-term half-dose apixaban vs long-term aspirin after 45-days of full-dose apixaban) after successful Watchman implantation.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the imaging performance and procedural safety of a prototype 4D ICE catheter during real-time intracardiac imaging and to optimize device imaging parameters, compared with current standard imaging modalities. TEE is the current standard of care and will serve as the primary imaging modality for clinical guidance during the EP and Structural Heart Disease (SHD) procedures. In this research protocol, TEE is not being investigated. ICE will be used as an adjunct imaging modality for research data collection and workflow evaluation only. All procedures will be performed using commercially available, FDA-approved Watchman devices, and no investigational implantable devices will be used. The use of ICE in this study does not modify the approved therapeutic device indication, implantation technique, or standard clinical decision-making.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among Veterans. Clinical trials are essential for developing better treatments, but Veterans remain underrepresented in these studies due to barriers including limited health literacy, lack of awareness, and mistrust. Current outreach approaches rely on either in-person physician conversations, which are limited by workforce constraints, or mailed letter invitations, which often fail to engage Veterans with limited health literacy. This study tests whether AI-generated video avatars can improve Veteran engagement in cardiovascular clinical trials.

This study aims to investigate whether a quick, additional CT scan of the heart, performed immediately after a standard CT scan for pulmonary embolism, can effectively detect blood clots in the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Detecting these clots is crucial before certain heart procedures to prevent stroke. Currently, a different, more involved procedure (Transesophageal Echocardiography - TEE) is often used. This study will assess if this additional CT scan is feasible, meaning if it can provide clear enough images to identify LAA clots without needing more contrast dye. The study will involve 60 patients, half receiving an "ungated" CT scan and the other half a "gated" CT scan (timed with their heart rhythm). The results of these scans will not be used for immediate patient care during the study, but rather to evaluate the CT scan technique itself. There is no direct benefit to participants, but the information gained could lead to faster diagnosis and reduced unnecessary testing for future patients.

This study is researching an experimental drug called REGN7508 (called "study drug") and how it compares against another treatment called apixaban. The study is focused on people who have atrial fibrillation, which means that the heart beats too fast and unevenly. The aim of the study is to see how safe and effective REGN7508 is in preventing stroke and/or systemic embolism in participants with atrial fibrillation and how it compares against participants that will receive apixaban in this study. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking the study drug * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the study drug less effective or could lead to side effects)

The main goal of this study is to find out how well BAY 3670549 works, how safe it is, how well people can tolerate it, and how the body handles the medicine. The study will compare BAY 3670549 to a placebo (a dummy treatment with no active medicine) in people with AF who need a treatment called electrical cardioversion. Electrical cardioversion is a procedure that helps the heart return to a normal rhythm. In this study, each participant will get a single intravenous (IV) infusion of either BAY 3670549 or a placebo. Participants will then be observed to see whether the heart rhythm returns to a normal rhythm. If it does not, electrical cardioversion can still be performed as planned. The study will look at how many participants return from AF to a normal rhythm, without needing electrical cardioversion and how long it takes. It will also show how many participants experience medical problems after treatment and how BAY 3670549 move into, through and out of the participants' body. The total duration of the study for an individual participant may be up two months. The findings from this study may contribute to the development of a new treatment option for people with AF.

This is a single-arm, open label, clinical outcome study to research the durability (success) of receiving a pulsed field ablation (PFA) per standard of care for treatment of atrial fibrillation during a subsequent procedure for the insertion of a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device. The reassessment of the initial ablation will be performed with or without additional ablation if needed.

The purpose of this study is assess the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) within one week of surgery in patients who receive pre-surgical stellate ganglion blockade with liposomal bupivacaine, compared to those receiving a saline placebo, using continuous electrocardiographic monitoring via wearable ECG devices.

The purpose of this study is to assess how safe VARIPULSE catheter system is for treatment of a heart rhythm disease called persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) in participants who are having a catheter ablation procedure (treat heart rhythm disease). This includes isolation of pulmonary vein and superior vena cava (heart veins; pulmonary vein isolation \[PVI\] and superior vena cava isolation \[SVCI\]), with or without another technique called posterior wall isolation (PWI). Also, to assess how safe it is for participants who are having a catheter ablation procedure and at the same time receiving another procedure called left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO; to reduce stroke risk). Additionally, to assess how well VARIPULSE catheter system works over a long period of time for treatment of PsAF in participants undergoing catheter ablation for PVI, SVCI and SVCI+PWI.

The purpose of this study is to assess how safe VARIPULSE pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter is and how well it works compared to food and drug administration (FDA) approved FARAWAVE PFA catheter in participants with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF; continuous irregular, rapid heartbeat that lasts over 7 days and doesn't stop on its own).

The goal of this prospective, non-randomized pilot study is to learn whether predictions from a previously validated 12-lead ECG-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm (ECG-AI) identify people more likely to have undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). The main questions it aims to answer are: Do people predicted to have high risk of AF using ECG-AI have a higher rate of new AF diagnosis using 1L ECG screening compared with people predicted to have a low risk? Do AI-based AF risk estimates from the 12-lead ECG correlate with AF risk estimates from the 1L ECG? Do people find 1L ECG screening for AF acceptable and useful? Participants will: Undergo screening with 1L ECG mailed to their home Complete a survey assessing attitudes toward 1L ECG screening Complete a 14-day patch monitor on 1 or 2 occasions depending on 1L ECG results