Behavioral Intervention for Specialty Referrals in Cardiology, Gastroenterology, and Pulmonology
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial aims to enhance how doctors refer patients to specialists in cardiology, gastroenterology, and pulmonology. It tests whether providing doctors with more information and a checklist about when a referral is valuable can reduce unnecessary referrals. The trial includes three groups: one follows the usual referral process, another receives additional information about high-value referrals, and the third receives both information and a checklist. UCLA Health doctors who have made specialty referrals in these areas qualify to participate. As an unphased trial, this study allows participants to contribute to improving healthcare referral processes.
What prior data suggests that this behavioral intervention is safe for physicians?
Research has shown that using checklists and information reviews in healthcare is both safe and beneficial. Studies indicate that checklists can significantly enhance patient safety and care quality. They are affordable and easy to implement, allowing seamless integration into existing systems.
One study demonstrated that safety reviews reduced unwanted side effects from 36.1% to 31.3%. This reduction highlights how reviews can enhance care by identifying issues before they impact patients.
Overall, these findings suggest that methods tested in trials, such as checklists and information reviews, are generally safe for healthcare use. They aim to improve decision-making and reduce unnecessary referrals without posing significant risks to participants.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores innovative ways to improve the referral process in cardiology, gastroenterology, and pulmonology. Traditional referral systems often lack clear guidelines and follow-up, but this trial introduces a behavioral intervention with three different approaches. One approach provides structured information and a review process to ensure referrals meet high-value criteria. Another adds a checklist that guides physicians to confirm all criteria before making a referral. These methods aim to streamline and enhance the quality of referrals, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and more efficient use of healthcare resources.
What evidence suggests that this trial's interventions could be effective in reducing low-value specialty referrals?
Research has shown that providing clear information and reviewing referral decisions can improve the quality of referrals to specialists. In this trial, some physicians will receive information and review support to enhance their referral decisions. For example, one study found that doctors who used specific guidelines adhered better to important referral rules, leading to improved patient outcomes. Additionally, another group in this trial will use a checklist. Studies have shown that checklists ensure all necessary steps are completed before making a referral, improving the consistency and quality of referrals. These methods aim to reduce unnecessary referrals, ensuring that patients who truly need specialist care receive it.678910
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for physicians who make referrals to cardiology, pulmonology, or gastroenterology specialists. There are no specific inclusion or exclusion criteria listed for patients.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Intervention
Physicians are randomized to one of three study arms and receive the EHR-embedded behavioral intervention designed to reduce low-value specialty referrals.
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after the intervention period.
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Auditing
- Checklist
- Information provision
Trial Overview
The study tests whether giving doctors information, feedback on their referral decisions, and a checklist in the electronic health record can help reduce unnecessary specialty referrals compared to usual practice.
How Is the Trial Designed?
3
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Eligible, randomly assigned physicians use an order composer that displays high-value referral criteria, informs them that their referral decisions may be reviewed, and includes cascading checkboxes prompting them to confirm that referral criteria are met before submitting.
Eligible, randomly assigned physicians use an order composer that displays criteria for high-value referrals and informs them that their referral decisions may be reviewed.
Eligible, randomly assigned physicians use a basic order composer, which allows them to place referrals with minimal support.
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead Sponsor
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Collaborator
Citations
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors ...
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were given recommendations during cardiology referrals.
Provider attributes correlation analysis to their referral ... - PMC
Our data-driven analysis identified several attributes that correlate with and discriminate against referral volume and peer-nominated awards.
3.
www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.offcampus.lib.washington.edu
www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/pubmedhealth/PMH0031764/https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.offcampus.lib.washing...
No information is available for this page.
Patients report high information coordination between ... - PMC
Our study aimed to describe patient experience of information coordination between their primary care physician and specialists and to ...
Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN ...
Outcomes measured: Rates. Approximately 1 in 20 (5.1%) office visits led to referral. Fifty conditions accounted for 76% of all referrals.
Clinical checklists
Evidence shows that incorporating checklists into routine care can significantly improve patient safety and care quality—while remaining low-cost and scalable.
Development of a checklist for auditing completion of patient ...
The Delphi process is a useful technique to develop a checklist. A checklist consisting of 133 total possible data elements to quality assure PRFs was designed.
Clinical audit on World Health Organization surgical safety ...
The WHO surgical safety checklist outlines essential standards of surgical care and has been shown to reduce complications and death associated with surgery.
Cardiology Audit Risk Checklist (Documentation + Coding)
This checklist outlines major audit triggers, documentation must-haves, and coding scenarios that require special attention across non-invasive ...
Free Clinical Audit Checklist | PDF
This medical audit checklist includes criteria such as clinical notes, patient management plan, immunization history, screening results, ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.