114 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

Ultra-high Dose Radiation for Liver Metastases

(ULTRAS Trial)

AH
Overseen ByAli Hosni, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: University Health Network, Toronto
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores a new method for treating liver tumors that have spread from other cancers. Researchers aim to determine if a single, very high dose of radiation using advanced technology (MR-Linac) proves more effective than the current high-dose treatment. This method, known as MR-guided Stereotactic Ablative Single-fraction, will be compared to assess tumor control and its impact on the patient's quality of life. Individuals with specific types of cancer that have spread to their liver, with up to three treatable tumors, may qualify for this study. As a Phase 3 trial, this treatment represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking advancements in cancer therapy.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

Participants must not be receiving any other standard anti-cancer therapy or experimental agent at the same time as the trial treatment. There needs to be at least a one-week break from systemic therapy before starting the trial treatment.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that MR-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, a type of focused radiation treatment, is generally safe and well-tolerated for treating liver metastases. In past studies, this treatment effectively controlled tumors, stopping cancer growth in the treated area. Importantly, patients did not experience severe side effects. For example, one study reported no serious immediate side effects, such as radiation-induced liver disease.

Another study found that this method was safe for various tumor types, with only minor side effects. This suggests that the treatment can be administered without causing major harm or discomfort to patients. Overall, these findings support MR-guided radiation as a promising and manageable option for patients with liver metastases, even at high radiation doses.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because they offer a new way to target liver metastases using ultra-high doses of radiation. Unlike traditional radiation therapy, which often requires multiple sessions, these treatments use a single, precise dose guided by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, allowing for more accurate targeting of tumors. One treatment arm uses an ultra-high dose of 38Gy, while the other uses a high dose of 27Gy, both potentially enhancing the effectiveness of destroying cancer cells without harming surrounding healthy tissue. This innovative approach could lead to faster, more effective treatment outcomes compared to conventional methods.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for liver metastases?

Studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which uses focused radiation to treat tumors, effectively addresses liver metastases. Previous patients experienced promising results with this method, although researchers continue to determine the optimal radiation dose. In this trial, participants will receive either an ultra-high dose or a high dose of radiation in a single session. The current hypothesis suggests that a very high dose in one session might better control tumors and cause fewer side effects. This treatment employs MR-Linac technology, combining MRI imaging with radiation to target the tumor more precisely. If successful, the ultra-high dose SBRT could improve tumor control and enhance the quality of life for patients with liver metastases.678910

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults (18+) with up to three liver tumors that have spread from certain cancers, each tumor no larger than 6 cm and not too close to major bile or digestive structures. Participants must be in good general health, able to undergo MRI scans, not pregnant or breastfeeding, and willing to complete quality of life surveys.

Inclusion Criteria

I have 1 to 3 liver tumors that are at least 2 cm away from bile ducts and inner surfaces.
I can and am willing to fill out quality of life surveys in English.
Women of childbearing potential must use contraception
See 10 more

Exclusion Criteria

History of claustrophobia
My treatment area is too large for the MRL machine.
My tumor is close to important ducts and will get high-dose SBRT.
See 7 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive MR-guided stereotactic ablative single-fraction radiation, either ultra-high dose (38Gy) or high dose (27Gy)

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety, effectiveness, and changes in biomarkers post-treatment

5 years
Regular visits at 1 and 3 months post-treatment, and at disease progression

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • MR-guided Stereotactic Ablative Single-fraction

Trial Overview

The study compares a single ultra-high dose of focused radiation (using MR-guided SBRT) versus the standard high dose for treating liver metastases. Patients are randomly assigned to either group. The goal is to see which approach better controls tumors and improves survival while monitoring side effects.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Group I: MRL adaptive ultra-high doseExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: MRL adaptive high doseExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University Health Network, Toronto

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,555
Recruited
526,000+

Citations

MR. Definition & Meaning

The meaning of MR. is —used as a conventional title of courtesy except when usage requires the substitution of a title of rank or an honorific or ...

2.

en.wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr.

Mr.

a commonly used English honorific for men without a higher honorific, or professional title, or any of various designations of office.

Mr., Mrs., Miss, and Ms.: What They Mean And How To Use ...

Mr. and Mrs. are typically used as titles or honorifics before a person's name to show respect. Traditionally, Mr. is used before the names of ...

Mr/Mrs or Mr./Mrs. — How to Spell

British (American) Mr (Mr.) – Mister (not usually written in full) Ms (Ms.) Mrs (Mrs.) Notice the American version uses a dot in all these abbreviations.

What is the difference between 'Mr.' and 'Mister' for an adult ...

What is the difference between "Mr." and "Mister" for an adult male, and when should each be used?

Daily adaptive MR-guided stereotactic ablative re-irradiation ...

Adaptive MR-guided re-SABR to liver OMD is safe with high LC (94.4%). No acute ≥ G2 toxicity, including RILD, was observed.

Multi-institutional Analysis of MR-Guided Single-Fraction ...

MR-guided SF-SABR is feasible, safe, and effective across various tumor locations, providing favorable LC with minimal toxicity, warranting further prospective ...

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for liver metastases

This review will focus on the question of the effectiveness, tolerability and the survival outcomes of patients undergoing SABR in the setting ...

MR-Guided Adaptive Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy ...

This study is the first to demonstrate that MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) targeting pancreatic lesions ...

1-year efficacy results after MR-guided risk-adapted ...

We achieved a high one-year overall survival rate of 82.6% using MR-guided SABR. •. Half of the patients remained off systemic therapy during 1-year follow-up.