160 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

Duramesh vs Minimally Invasive IPOM for Umbilical Hernia

NL
Overseen ByNancy Ly, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Northwestern University
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two methods for repairing umbilical hernias in individuals at higher risk of complications. It compares a new method, Duramesh, which uses a special suture, with a traditional minimally invasive method, Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM), that places mesh inside the abdomen. The primary goal is to determine if the new method results in equal or less pain the day after surgery compared to the traditional method. The trial will also evaluate other factors such as complications, quality of life, and hernia recurrence over two years. It seeks adults with a bothersome umbilical hernia and conditions like obesity, diabetes, smoking, or COPD, who are planning elective hernia repair. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to contribute to medical research and potentially benefit from innovative treatment options.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

In a previous study, Duramesh, a special type of mesh used in stitches, demonstrated a hernia recurrence rate of just 1%, significantly lower than the 11% rate with traditional stitches. This finding suggests that Duramesh effectively prevents hernias from returning.

Research has shown that Duramesh is generally well-tolerated. In one trial, within 90 days after surgery, only a few patients experienced reopening of the surgical wound or bruising, and about 12% required hospital readmission. Importantly, there were no serious complications related to anesthesia.

For the Minimally Invasive IPOM procedure, research consistently highlights its effectiveness but also notes some potential for pain and long-term issues with the mesh. However, specific safety data on IPOM remains limited.

Overall, previous studies have shown that both Duramesh and IPOM are effective and relatively safe, with Duramesh offering an advantage in terms of lower recurrence rates and fewer complications.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Unlike the standard of care for umbilical hernias, which often involves minimally invasive techniques with mesh placement, Duramesh repair uses a unique approach with interrupted sutures and no additional mesh. This method potentially reduces foreign material in the body, aiming to minimize complications and enhance recovery. Researchers are excited because it could offer a simpler, less invasive option while providing effective hernia repair. Meanwhile, the study also compares this to the IPOM method, which is known for using a laparoscopic or robotic approach with coated polypropylene mesh for repair. This comparison helps determine if Duramesh can match or exceed the outcomes of the minimally invasive IPOM technique.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for umbilical hernia repair?

This trial will compare two methods for umbilical hernia repair: Duramesh repair and Minimally Invasive Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM). Research has shown that using mesh for umbilical hernia repair usually lowers the chance of recurrence compared to using stitches alone. One study found that mesh repair significantly reduces recurrence rates, with only 1% of hernias returning compared to 11% for those repaired without mesh. Duramesh, one of the treatments in this trial, is a newer type of mesh that distributes tension during repair, potentially reducing complications like pain or long-term issues.

For the IPOM method, another treatment option in this trial, studies have found it to be a safe and effective way to fix hernias, with a low recurrence rate of 4.9% for hernias less than 5 cm wide. However, complications related to the mesh can occur over time. Both options in this trial aim to reduce the chance of hernia recurrence, but each has its own potential risks and benefits.36789

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults at high risk (such as those with obesity, diabetes, smoking history, or COPD) who are scheduled for elective umbilical hernia repair. It excludes people not considered high-risk or those unable to have surgery.

Inclusion Criteria

I am scheduled for a planned surgical repair.
At least one high-risk comorbidity: BMI ≥30, active smoking, diabetes, or COPD
I am 18 years old or older.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

My hernia is larger than 6 centimeters.
Urgent or emergent presentation
My wound is classified as CDC class II, III, or IV.
See 3 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo either Duramesh repair or minimally invasive IPOM for umbilical hernia repair

1 day
1 visit (in-person for surgery)

Postoperative Care

Standardized postoperative care and discharge analgesia are provided

5 days

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety, effectiveness, and recurrence of hernia

2 years
Multiple visits (in-person and virtual) over 2 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Duramesh
  • Minimally Invasive Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM)

Trial Overview

The study compares two surgical methods: Duramesh suture repair versus minimally invasive IPOM mesh placed inside the abdomen. Participants are randomly assigned to one of these treatments to see which leads to less pain and fewer complications.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: Duramesh repairExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: IPOMActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Northwestern University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,674
Recruited
989,000+

Citations

Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical ...

After 30 days, surgical site complication rates were similar: 23.7 per cent after mesh repair compared to 18.1 per cent after suture repair.

Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.

There were seven readmissions (12.1%) within 90 days, of which only one was related to the abdominal wall closure. There were three reoperations ...

(PDF) A modern comparison of suture repair versus mesh ...

The overall postoperative complication rate was 12.9% and the average hospitalization length was 3.2 days. The postoperative pain scores decreased from 3.6 to ...

Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh ...

Mesh repair significantly reduces hernia recurrence rates (1%) compared to suture repair (11%) (P = 0.0015). The study involved 200 patients with a mean follow- ...

Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Mesh for Umbilical Hernia ...

Research has shown that using mesh for umbilical hernia repair reduces the chance of recurrence compared to stitching alone.

Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia ...

Mesh repair showed lower rates of recurrence in the overall analysis (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.79; P = 0.003; I² = 24%) and for hernia defects ...

Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults

There were no significant anaesthetic complications or surgical deaths. The mean duration of surgery was greater for mesh than for suture repair (45 versus 38 ...

Effect of Duramesh™ on Hernia Formation After Ileostomy ...

The Aim of this study is to evaluate Duramesh™ suture vs standard closure on rates of hernia formation after ileostomy closure. Eligibility.

9.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20131534/

Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and ...

Conclusions: Anterior preperitoneal mesh repair of abdominal wall midline hernias under local anesthesia seems to be a safe and effective technique that can be ...