Antiplatelet Therapy for Coronary Artery Dissection

(SCAD-ALIGN Trial)

Not yet recruiting at 4 trial locations
SB
JA
Overseen ByJane A. Leopold, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 4
Sponsor: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial seeks the best treatment for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), a rare heart condition primarily affecting women aged 30 to 55. SCAD can cause chest pain and shortness of breath without typical heart disease risk factors. The study compares two strategies: one group will take a single antiplatelet drug, such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid or ASA), for three months, while the other will take two drugs (acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel) for three months, followed by one drug for nine more months. The goal is to determine if less medication is more effective for this condition. Individuals who have experienced an acute heart problem suspected to be SCAD and are set for conservative treatment might be suitable candidates for this trial. As a Phase 4 trial, this research involves an FDA-approved treatment, aiming to understand its benefits for more patients.

What is the safety track record for these treatments?

Previous studies have used aspirin safely in many patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Research has shown that managing the condition with aspirin is safe for stable patients. Some patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), which includes aspirin and another medication, have reported side effects like bruising and heavy menstrual bleeding.

The other medication under study is clopidogrel, which has shown mixed results. Some studies suggest that patients on DAPT, including clopidogrel, may experience higher rates of chest pain and other heart-related issues compared to those taking just one medication. However, clopidogrel alone might reduce the risk of major heart and brain events compared to aspirin alone.

Overall, both aspirin and clopidogrel are widely used and generally well-tolerated, though they can have side effects. Patients should always discuss any concerns with a healthcare provider.12345

Why are researchers enthusiastic about this study treatment?

Most treatments for coronary artery dissection involve antiplatelet therapy to prevent further clotting, typically using drugs like acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone or in combination with clopidogrel. However, what's exciting about the current protocol under investigation is the strategic duration and combination of these medications. The "moderate APT" approach involves taking ASA for three months and then stopping it, which could potentially reduce medication burden and side effects. Meanwhile, the "intensive APT" method starts with a dual therapy of ASA and clopidogrel for three months, then switches to clopidogrel alone for nine months. This could offer more tailored protection against clotting over a longer period. Researchers are keen to see if these varying regimens could lead to better outcomes, minimize side effects, and improve overall patient management.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for SCAD?

This trial will compare two antiplatelet therapy approaches for spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Research has shown that using one antiplatelet medication (SAPT) might be safer and more effective than using two (DAPT). Specifically, one study found that using two medications in SCAD could lead to worse outcomes, suggesting that using just one might be better. In this trial, the moderate APT arm involves taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, which has reduced the chance of another stroke by 15% in similar situations. The intensive APT arm includes clopidogrel, another medication, which lowered the risk of major heart and brain events by about 14% and has a lower risk of causing bleeding compared to other similar drugs. These treatments prevent excessive blood clotting, which can worsen the condition.12678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults diagnosed with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), a rare type of heart attack, usually affecting women aged 30-55 who do not have typical risk factors or significant artery clogging. Participants must have had SCAD confirmed by doctors and be able to follow the study plan.

Inclusion Criteria

The patient is cooperative and available for the entire study
Suspected SCAD on coronary angiography determined by the local investigator
I am planning to treat my SCAD without surgery or invasive procedures.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

I need to take blood thinners by mouth.
I am currently experiencing life-threatening bleeding.
I have a known tendency to bleed easily.
See 11 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either moderate APT therapy (3 months ASA) or intensive APT therapy (3 months DAPT with ASA + clopidogrel), followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy for the intensive group

12 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with assessments including MACE and quality of life measures

12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)
  • Clopidogrel

Trial Overview

The trial compares two treatments after SCAD: one group gets only aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) for three months; the other gets both aspirin and clopidogrel for three months, then just aspirin for nine more months. Patients are randomly assigned to each group.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: moderate APTExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: intensive APTActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Lead Sponsor

Trials
497
Recruited
2,984,000+

National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK

Collaborator

Trials
1
Recruited
20+

Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH

Industry Sponsor

Trials
11
Recruited
3,000+

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)

Collaborator

Trials
48
Recruited
128,000+

Cardio-CARE AG, Davos

Collaborator

Davos Life Science Pte Ltd

Industry Sponsor

Citations

Evaluating the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in spontaneous ...

Generalized DAPT use in SCAD may lead to worse outcomes, suggesting SAPT as a safer alternative in many cases. • Guideline development and ...

Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation for Spontaneous ...

Safety and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Rehabil Med Clin Commun, 1 (2018), Article 1000001.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current State of ...

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Most coronary dissections will heal spontaneously, and conservative treatment is recommended for uncomplicated cases. Patients with left main ...

Management and outcomes of spontaneous coronary ...

The outcomes of interest were all-cause death; cardiovascular death; and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart ...

OAC or Aspirin Plus Ticagrelor Increases MACE Risk in ...

Results showed that over the median 21 months of follow-up, a MACE event occurred in 8.6% of patients, mostly due to nonfatal MI, and SCAD ...

Impact of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway on the ... - PMC

In safe in conservatively managed patients. Acetylsalicylic Acid, A growing body of evidence supports conservative management in hemodynamically stable SCAD ...

Think SCAD (Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection) for ...

Wearable-derived data provide new insights into how clinical outcomes for patients treated with CAVT and anticoagulation, and anticoagulation ...