Urispas

Children with medical complexity often receive a recommendation to see an outpatient clinician soon after leaving the hospital. It is uncertain whether every child needs this routine visit or whether follow-up can be guided by the family's concerns and the child's recovery. AFTERCARE is a multicenter pilot randomized trial comparing these two follow-up recommendations for children hospitalized with an acute infection. Families will be assigned by chance to receive either a recommendation to arrange follow-up with their usual outpatient clinician within seven days or a recommendation to seek follow-up if the child is not improving as expected or new concerns arise. Families in both groups may seek medical care whenever needed. The study will assess recruitment, follow-up data collection, delivery of the recommendations and acceptability. Caregiver surveys and medical record review will also describe outpatient visits and hospital returns. This pilot will inform the design of a larger trial, and is not designed to establish that the strategies are equally safe or effective.

Urethritis from Mycoplasma genitalium is difficult to treat and often does not respond to first line therapy. In this case series study, individuals who have failed first line therapy will receive omadacycline (provided by Paratek Pharmaceuticals) to determine the safety and feasibility of using this agent for this condition.

Prospective, randomized, single-blind study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NASHA Dx investigational device compared to controlled device Bulkamid in adult women with mild, moderate and intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).

Nocturia is defined by doctors as getting up one or more times a night to use the bathroom, where you were asleep before going to use the washroom and then going back to sleep afterward. People who experience this condition describe it was one of their biggest problems. This condition is very common as people get older and can seriously affect older peoples quality of life including disruptions to sleep, daily functioning, risk of falls and even early death.

WorkoutCPP is a pilot study evaluating the feasibility of a personalized exercise recommendation system for individuals with chronic pelvic pain disorders (CPPDs). The study uses reinforcement learning (RL), a type of artificial intelligence that adapts recommendations over time based on each participant's reported pain levels, symptom burden, and exercise compliance. Participants receive daily exercise recommendations that alternate between standard, non-personalized guidance and personalized, RL-generated recommendations across four 2-week phases, allowing within-person comparison of outcomes under each condition. The primary hypothesis is that an RL-based adaptive recommendation system is feasible to deliver in a CPPD population.

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial will compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of two mini-flexible ureteroscopes (6.3Fr and 7.5Fr) used during flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of renal stones. Adult patients with renal stones up to 15 mm who are scheduled to undergo flexible ureteroscopy will be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups. The primary objectives are to compare stone-free rates and the ability to achieve primary renal access without preoperative ureteral stenting. Secondary outcomes include operative time, fluoroscopy use, ureteral trauma, postoperative stenting, pain, complications, emergency department visits, need for additional procedures, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness. The results of this study are expected to provide high-quality evidence to guide the selection of mini-flexible ureteroscopes and improve the quality, safety, and value of surgical care for patients with kidney stones.

Patients who seek care through MedStar National Rehab Hospital's clinic believing they have a UTI will be enrolled in this trial. They will be pre-screened after consent according to a standard-of-care clinical symptom measure called the USQNB. If determined by this measure to be at high or moderate likelihood of having a UTI, they will be assigned to the presumed UTI arm and instructed to come to the clinic to provide a urine sample and undergo standard diagnostic testing to determine if a UTI is present. Those not assigned to the presumed UTI arm at this phase are assigned to the presumed no UTI arm and do not present to the clinic. These tests include a repeated questionnaire about the UTI symptoms they are experiencing and collection of a urine sample from a freshly changed indwelling catheter for standard clinical urinalysis testing and culture. Based upon the clinical guideline-informed results of these standard clinical tests, patients will be assigned into one of two potential arms (suspected UTI or suspected non-UTI) based on whether or not they are diagnosed with UTI at that visit. Arm 1 (presumed UTI) participants will have a second urine sample collected at the time of the visit from the used indwelling catheter bag in addition to the freshly changed catheter sample, and both will be divided into three portions: one for repeat clinical tests and culture, one for assessment using the experimental Jiddu device, and one to be stored for potential future studies. The study doctor will then determine antibiotic choice according to standard clinical decision making and record, but not prescribe, that choice. Once results are obtained from the samples sent for experimental analysis, the study doctor will use those results in addition to their best clinical judgement and all standard available clinical evidence to choose the antibiotic treatment. Arm 1 participants will then complete urine symptom surveys at day 3 and 7 during antibiotic use to determine effectiveness of antibiotics prescribed. In the event of standard urine culture results differing from the Jiddu-produced pooled AST values rescue antibiotic consisting of the antibiotic choice based on best clinical judgement using this newly available evidence will be used to ensure safety and this survey clock will restart and include a USQNB on day 10. Arm 2 participants will repeat the urinary symptoms questionnaire 3 and 7 days after their initial completion to see if their symptoms have changed and would allow them to qualify. If they remain unqualified at 7 days, they will be instructed to fill out another survey the next time they think they have a UTI. This process will repeat until they either qualify to become an Arm 1 participant or 6 months have passed since they first consented.

Obtaining intravenous (IV) access is one of the most common procedures performed in the emergency department (ED). IV access is necessary for many aspects of patient care, including blood tests, administration of medications and intravenous fluids, and diagnostic imaging. However, some patients have difficult intravenous access (DIVA), making it challenging to successfully place an IV catheter. Difficulty obtaining IV access can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment, prolonged emergency department stays, multiple needle punctures, and increased patient discomfort. Several specialized IV devices are available for patients with DIVA. Two commonly used ultrasound-guided devices are long peripheral intravenous catheters and single-lumen midline catheters. Both devices are inserted into veins using ultrasound guidance, but they differ in catheter length and expected duration of use. Long peripheral IV catheters are commonly used in emergency departments but may fail relatively quickly. Midline catheters may remain functional for longer periods and may reduce the need for additional IV insertions during a patient's hospital stay. However, these devices have traditionally been inserted by specialized clinicians, such as members of vascular access teams, rather than by bedside emergency department nurses, who perform most vascular access procedures in many emergency departments. The purpose of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided single-lumen midline catheters with ultrasound-guided long peripheral IV catheters when both procedures are performed by specially trained bedside emergency department nurses. The study will evaluate whether midline catheters can be inserted as successfully and as safely as long peripheral IV catheters in adult emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either an ultrasound-guided single-lumen midline catheter or an ultrasound-guided long peripheral IV catheter. Researchers will compare the two devices by measuring procedural success, catheter-related complications, catheter dwell time, completion of care using the original device, and patient satisfaction. The results of this study may help determine whether bedside emergency department nurses with training and experience in ultrasound-guided vascular access can successfully use single-lumen midline catheters in routine clinical practice. The study will also evaluate which vascular access device provides the best balance of safety, reliability, and patient experience for emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. This information may help guide future recommendations for vascular access device selection in the emergency department.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if educational videos can reduce pre-operative anxiety in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The main question it aims to answer are: do patient education videos decrease preoperative anxiety? do patient education videos increase patient preparedness for surgery? Researchers will compare the group who watched the videos preoperatively to the group who only underwent the usual counseling at the preoperative visit to see if the results of a survey that measures anxiety and preparedness differ. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group that will be asked to watch the educational videos and one group that will not. All participants will attend their pre-operative appointment as usual and complete a survey afterwards.

The aims of the Observational Approach versus Surgical Intervention for Asymptomatic Stone (OASIS) trial are: 1) to determine whether observation compared to upfront surgery results in less healthcare-related life disruption due to kidney stones among children and adults with asymptomatic kidney stones; 2) to identify the groups benefiting the most from each strategy; and 3) to determine the preferences and values informing the choice between observation and upfront surgery.

A single-arm, multicenter, international, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of an investigational device during retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal calculi.

This project aims to improve the diagnosis and management of urinary tract symptoms in older women by comparing three common treatment strategies-empiric antibiotics, urinalysis-guided therapy, and culture-directed care-in a randomized trial. By integrating patient-reported outcomes, laboratory data, the study will identify which patients benefit from antibiotics and which can safely avoid them. Findings will inform precision care strategies and promote antibiotic stewardship while improving symptom outcomes and quality of life in this high-risk population.